Home > Massachusetts > Six Flags New England > Bizzaro > Review Comments
 Review of Bizzaro @ Six Flags New England
0 Rating Posted by: SFNE GUY on 7/14/2001 11:59:00 PM
words can not subscribe this!! this ride RULES MAJOR @$$!!!! And I didnt think it could beat MF! WRONG!!!!! MF shall bow down to this ride!!!
 

Review Comments

XtremeFan8 on 8/9/2001 12:07:53 AM said:
u havent been on MF cuz it is 500x better then this lame ride! u shall bow down at the gates of MF cuz ur gonna be crying cuz it scares u so much!
ioaddict33 on 8/9/2001 12:14:10 AM said:
Um...I do believe he did say in his review that he had ridden Millennium Force, AND that SFNE SROS was a lot better. Are you going to jump down my throat because I think Fire Dragon and Raging Bull are both better than Millennium Force, too?
Paul on 8/9/2001 10:56:35 PM said:
yeah! SROS IS NOT a lame ride YOU HAVE NOT EVEN RIDDEN IT!!!!! Thats not fair to say, SROS has better airtime a better layout and...you dont believe me? go ride it yourself and see and stop jumping down everyones throats because there opinions differ from yours!! stop being ignorant!
XtremeFan8 on 8/9/2001 10:59:04 PM said:
ok but guess what life isnt fair! so stop talking like u know me!
XtremeFan8 on 8/9/2001 10:59:20 PM said:
but u have 2 admit MF is better!
Paul on 8/9/2001 11:01:04 PM said:
no I dont. youll just have to ride SROS you just may agree, its tough to explain.
XtremeFan8 on 8/9/2001 11:03:28 PM said:
i ahve rode it! and MF is way better!
XtremeFan8 on 8/9/2001 11:03:37 PM said:
i have rode it! and MF is way better!
Paul on 8/9/2001 11:06:00 PM said:
ohh so you probably passed on Cyclone while you were there, did you go in 2000 or this year?
XtremeFan8 on 8/9/2001 11:11:17 PM said:
no i didnt go in 2000!
XtremeFan8 on 8/9/2001 11:14:29 PM said:
yes u already told me that!
NYCTom on 10/4/2001 8:22:46 PM said:
MF is better it has the bigger drop and the angle is 80 degrees while SROS is like 78 or 77...and the layout is better too...sorry but MF is better and I have been on both
supafly on 10/4/2001 8:33:43 PM said:
NYCTom, I agree with you. MF beats SROS by a thread. But thats just my opinion. Either way, BOTH COASTERS RULE!!!
NYCTom on 10/4/2001 8:39:20 PM said:
Yeah SROS is not a bad ride it is a thrilling ride, but it is definetly not better than MF
SFNE GUY on 10/4/2001 8:47:09 PM said:
For me I like airtime and SROS has alot more. Plus its longer.
NYCTom on 10/5/2001 5:25:01 PM said:
No, MF has more airtime becuase the train zooms over the hills and its just better like the drop alone makes it better your comparing SROS to a classic
SFNE GUY on 10/6/2001 12:10:33 AM said:
to a classic?? MF has 3 points of airtime, SROS has 6! Double it!
NYCTom on 10/6/2001 10:32:49 AM said:
but your comparing SROS to a gigacoaster they are not even in the same league....and I mean MF beats SROS by a long shot you SFNE fans compare your coasters to classics...i.e th CI Cyclone to SF Cyclone...dont bother comparing the coasters Im sorry but that park needs some good coasters
SFNE GUY on 10/6/2001 12:48:20 PM said:
If your referring to SFNE they will soon. They have ALOT of room to expand.
Post Review Comment
You must login or create an account to post a review comment.
 
Clicky Web Analytics