Home > New York > Darien Lake > Ride of Steel > Review Comments


 Review of Ride of Steel @ Darien Lake
0 Rating Posted by: Shortcake on 6/25/2001 8:32:00 PM
It has a great start, a mediocre middle, and a decent ending. Easily the best coaster in the park.
 

Review Comments

daptwa on 4/11/2002 1:44:05 PM said:
I agree this coaster really is a steady decling thoughout the whole ride.
Shortcake on 4/15/2002 12:57:38 PM said:
It just doesnt retain the intensity that the one at SFNE does. I was very disappointed when I rode it. I just didnt believe that it could be so different.
daptwa on 4/18/2002 2:57:30 AM said:
I second that. I didnt know if the train was going to make it over the bunny hills or not.
steven1717 on 12/6/2002 12:37:19 PM said:
Wow, I must have hit this coaster on a good night. I rode it 15 times or more. Many times without getting off. I rode in every seat it seemed and the sheer power and speed of the train seemed unstopable at the end of the ride.
mrceagle on 12/6/2002 10:55:36 PM said:
from what i wave seen their are section that are straight or a single hill where two would have sit. they seamed to go cheap on this ride. it was put in to just be a hypers and another coaster for the park and area.
MagnumMan on 12/8/2002 11:06:54 PM said:
but remember also, this was Intamins first hyper and a prototype so it wasnt expected to be perfect. same thing with SFAs, i guess. only mirrored. wow steven, guess you did hit it on a good night as I only get to go about 2 or 3 times every vacation because of the lines. good for you!
mrceagle on 12/8/2002 11:11:01 PM said:
Then they should instal somthig like water cannons next to the track. You now in the superherow cartoons they fly over water water shots out do to the speen.
MagnumMan on 12/9/2002 12:25:48 PM said:
that would be awesome, especially on the straight track. also, it would be somewhat realistic because theres a lake right next to each straight track
mrceagle on 12/9/2002 10:56:20 PM said:
yep and I bet they never even though or consedered it. Six FLags always is laking is theming and creativity.
XtremeFan8 on 12/9/2002 11:15:35 PM said:
Six Flags and theming, are two words that do not belong in the same sentance. Unless its Six Flags SUCKS ASS at their theming!
mrceagle on 12/9/2002 11:22:07 PM said:
very true. but is y last post it ws there to talk bad about it and inthat cans gets the exeption. but, I think shucks ass is a little under the truth.
MagnumMan on 12/10/2002 10:21:43 AM said:
i dont know why but they also seems to lack in consistency of the theming also. for example, SFMM or SFGA have adequate themeing while parks like SFA have almost no theming at all. Have some or none at all, I say (I think they should go with #1)
mrceagle on 12/10/2002 12:35:40 PM said:
Thow alot of small amusment park are having wellthemed area look at Camobie Laek parks Old Camobie Vilage and YE old Boston, and Funtown USAs chines theme around Dragons decent and the hole theming leading up to Excaliber.
it can be don themes small parks are doing it why cant Six flags.
XtremeFan8 on 12/10/2002 4:48:08 PM said:
SIx Flags never has theming. Their parks just have theming because the proior ownweship, before SIx Flags bought it out.
mrceagle on 12/11/2002 3:17:34 PM said:
Teh first Six Flags as in(SFOT) was themed. they mant to be a themepark. thow as they got bought out by premeir parks they took on parks that wernt and just modefide them to be themed. this dosnt work
XtremeFan8 on 12/12/2002 2:50:48 PM said:
Yea well, Six Flags sucks with the theming. Too cheap and too stupid!
mrceagle on 12/12/2002 11:10:26 PM said:
true but it dont take much to theme well and it dosnt take alot of money either. it comes down to them becoming laysy and yes cheap.
MagnumMan on 12/13/2002 1:02:44 PM said:
i agree with you mrceagle. SFOT is very well themed, landscaping-wise, with the best tree"ing" ive ever seen. why SF couldnt have done this with at least SOME of their parks, are beyond me.
XtremeFan8 on 12/13/2002 3:07:29 PM said:
Because they are stupid!
mrceagle on 12/13/2002 10:20:03 PM said:
Because that would take time. why spend more time and money when peaple come for the rides. SFinc is a glorifide amusment park. they can do it they just rather keep the money for them self.
XtremeFan8 on 12/14/2002 7:03:55 PM said:
Because good scenery, makes a good park! Not just the rides.
Cyclonic on 12/14/2002 11:04:04 PM said:
That is not nessesearily true. A good park needs good, well maintaned rides, a well trained and enthusiastic staff, and managment that can balance the finances to make the park both finacially susseccful and reasonably priced. This is something that Six Flags no longer seems to understand. Themeing is secondary to those things.
mrceagle on 12/14/2002 11:30:59 PM said:
True but theiy have the rides and dont put seanery for themeing around it. yes a park needs good rides. but if your calling yourself a themepark you need to think of the theming at the same time.
XtremeFan8 on 12/17/2002 4:26:27 PM said:
Right on mrceagle!
MagnumMan on 12/17/2002 9:49:34 PM said:
Thats an exellent point again. THEMEPARK...hmmm...is that just to lure customers into one of their mediocre parks or are they being serious about this title. Ill take #1
mrceagle on 12/18/2002 12:19:05 AM said:
Becouse they now a large magority of the peaple comign are coming for the coaster. they dont look at things like you or I do. as enthusiasts we look at a biger picture. thow this parks should be catering to our standards. they chose to lower themselves to the magority that could care less.
it work in the past. but with more peaple now visiting true theme parks like IOA , Universal, adn disney it no longer sufices and their lef tin the dark.
another reason is the expansion from buying already astablished parks. thow this was more cost afective and removed compitition, it forced them to take a non themed park and transform it into a theme park. this leads to a bleack themed park and an even porer themepark experiance.
MagnumMan on 12/18/2002 3:32:44 PM said:
the only parks i think Six Flags has actually improved is SFNE, so ive heard, SFDL [because of Superman mainly. before its incorporation, the park was very unknown. although its seemed to have been dropped in a way, at least theres a ligitamate reason to go] and SFWoA [although, besides rides, this park is wreched]. all the others really arent on the best track by having SF as their owners
XtremeFan8 on 12/18/2002 3:38:01 PM said:
Why do you think Busch Gardens gets rated so high. It has two good coasters, thats it! It just has AMAZING SCENERY!
MagnumMan on 12/18/2002 10:45:08 PM said:
Best scenery in any park in the world, id say but you know what? Its natural so its a little different. That part, in particular, of Virginia has an abundance of trees and dont forget the James River which just HAPPENS to be there. So does BGW have to grow any trees or plant many flowers. NOT AT ALL! You think a place like, lets say, Houston [SFA] has a river or many trees. OF COURSE NOT! The trees that it DID have were obviously cut down for real estate! So, natural scenery [which really brings out a park more beautifully than artificial scenery], you cant exactly blame SF for. But, of course, on the other hand, if theyd choose better locations to own parks and create parks instead of building up rides, for example, in a park surrounded basically by skyscrapers, maybe they could have a sucessful park without even having to do much of anything theme-wise [just SFs type of thing!].
mrceagle on 12/19/2002 12:19:02 AM said:
For starters the themeing at SFNE is ok. thow the areas that peaple praise as well themed areas at SFNE are the western town and the rockvill(50s)area both of which were built before six flags. they added the Super heroe area and updated the kidie land WB movie town.
The thing is they ofen remove the trees from the area and build or they only add cheper trees wile they could spend a little more and buy aged trees.
Cyclonic on 12/19/2002 1:07:28 AM said:
What I was trying to say is that a good park does not need theming. Look at parks like Dorney Park, Knoebels, or Cedar Point, they are all excellent parks with no theming in them. They are all run very well, have the right people working there, and are clean and friendly places to go. Six Flags parks are not. Six Flag has a problem with park theming, but it has a bigger problem with the parks themselves, and until the parks are cleaned up and made competitive with the local compitition (i.e. those small, local, clean, friendly parks) then the theming issue really does need to take a back seat. As it stands now, SF parks are seen (and largly true) as being dirty, crowded, inefficant, having rude employees, and overpriced. Why put up with all of that when you can go to that nice little park down the road, have a great time, and spend half as much money. Theming is the least of SFs problems.
XtremeFan8 on 12/19/2002 3:02:15 PM said:
Stop writing so long of comments. Short and sweet gets the job done.
Cyclonic on 12/19/2002 7:02:48 PM said:
How is this for short: Screw off!
mrceagle on 12/19/2002 7:24:17 PM said:
verry true. ie SFNE atendance went down almost 10% last season wile canobie lake park went down 2% and lake compounce went down 4%. both the smaller rides took SFNE for the season. they are both cleaner compounce has no themeing wile canobie has a couple of themed areas in the park. both have freindly emplayer and cost much less.

Im going to start a thred on critics descusion titled whats up with.... we can contunue theis descution in the forums!!
XtremeFan8 on 12/19/2002 10:37:11 PM said:
Shut up Black!
MagnumMan on 12/20/2002 6:53:38 PM said:
LOL
XtremeFan8 on 12/20/2002 10:58:56 PM said:
See, short and sweet, but got my point across!
mrceagle on 12/21/2002 12:00:58 AM said:
I set up a forum to continue with this descusion. it in whats up with.... in the critics descusion.
XtremeFan8 on 12/21/2002 6:34:03 PM said:
Why did you do that? You could just continue it here!
Cyclonic on 12/21/2002 11:25:44 PM said:
Probably because you will never bother to go into that forum. Something about you being too lazy to do that or something, or was it your time is just sooooo pressing that you can just keep up with one forum at a time. Personally, I think it is just that you are too stupid to keep up with more then one forum at a time. LOL
B&M Rider on 12/22/2002 1:39:22 AM said:
this is so hilarious...sorry to see that u cant argue back on this topic anymore xtreme. i think now every argument i get into with u ill just continue in another thread in critics discussion. since ur afraid to go there, ull never know and ppl will think ur a coward
XtremeFan8 on 12/22/2002 2:48:23 PM said:
Yes, because you all are afraid of me and my skills. Too bad for you fellas.
mrceagle on 12/22/2002 2:57:50 PM said:
im any thing but afraid. im looking at the fact that this has escaped being a responce on shortcakes review and become a descusion. so I moved it to the forums so this thred wont go beyond 42 posts.
MagnumMan on 12/22/2002 4:20:25 PM said:
oh please, Xtreme. if thats what you think, you are dead wrong. but thanks for your opinion...
B&M Rider on 12/22/2002 10:47:06 PM said:
he thinks hes god and that he rules over us like hitler. dont worry, its just a phase
XtremeFan8 on 12/22/2002 11:01:50 PM said:
What the hell is wrong with you B&M? Are you that cruel to compare someone to Hitler? You seriously need some help!
B&M Rider on 12/22/2002 11:23:23 PM said:
hitler ruled by using terror. you think youre god at this site and think everyones afraid of you. see the similarity?
XtremeFan8 on 12/23/2002 12:11:06 AM said:
I do not think I am god. I know I am god. No really, I really dont.
MagnumMan on 12/23/2002 10:24:47 AM said:
then why do you act like youre so much better than us? reviews are reviews and posts are posts. if you are really serious, then all i can say is that you have your way and we have ours. its not a thing you can judge. but i dont think you are being serious, so ill say this. GET-RID-OF-THE-(fake)-EGO!
XtremeFan8 on 12/29/2002 1:49:21 AM said:
Maybe you all just think you are just lesser than me. Is lesser a word? It is now!
B&M Rider on 12/29/2002 11:08:11 AM said:
Xtreme made a new word with his godly powers! we shall bow down to him!

id rather bow down to a toilet
MagnumMan on 12/30/2002 9:44:40 AM said:
ooooooh, harsh!
XtremeFan8 on 1/3/2003 8:55:30 AM said:
Well you better get cracking on your toliet bowing B&M.
Roy G. Biv on 9/4/2006 8:54:50 PM said:
I like eggs.
Post Review Comment
You must login or create an account to post a review comment.

 
Clicky Web Analytics