Home > Florida > Universal Studios Florida > E.T. Adventure > Review Comments


 Review of E.T. Adventure @ Universal Studios Florida
0 Rating Posted by: xDisney on 8/15/2001 10:28:00 PM
Waiting in line is much more fun than the ride. They should gut the attraction and try again.
 

Review Comments

Sephiroth7 on 10/15/2001 8:48:32 PM said:
I thought it was a good dark ride. It wanst suppposed to be thrilling, but I found it quite fun.
Paul on 10/16/2001 10:19:43 AM said:
Then end with the singing mushrooms almost made me and my uncles cry out in Shame, that wasnt even in the movie.
Barnsey on 11/29/2001 2:50:21 PM said:
Always remember to give yourself a really funny name when going on this!
Sephiroth7 on 11/29/2001 4:44:10 PM said:
I was Hermie and my friend was Spermy...hehe
xDisney on 11/29/2001 6:11:16 PM said:
At least Seph enjoyed it.
Sephiroth7 on 3/30/2002 7:42:36 PM said:
Also...why is this ride rated so low and Peter Pan gets good ratings...they are both meant for kids, both use the same technology really, and both hang....seems to me people expect it to be a thrill ride. I find it dissapointing to see so many good reviews for Peter Pan and not for E.T., cuz E.T. isnt all that bad...
xDisney on 3/30/2002 7:49:04 PM said:
Well Seph, if you check out the other numerous revs you might know. This attraction has an overall rating of about 5.00, in other words it stinks. It was a half-hearted attempt at best. The ending was the pits. The best part of the attraction was the waiting area. The second best part was the exit. I would think someone like yourself would like "Peter" better than ET.
Sephiroth7 on 3/30/2002 8:08:29 PM said:
Very true Disney...it does have a rating of 5.0...thats what im questioning...SO many people dont like it. It is so similar to Peter Pan and in my opinion a little better. I just feel it was done well...the ending is cool...it seems very Disney to me which is very unlike Universal. If this had been in Disney, I think it would have just as good, if not better reviews then PP...
xDisney on 3/30/2002 8:13:45 PM said:
Maybe Disney would have built an attraction people liked. Halfway through the attraction the sets turned to crap. If I had to guess, the attraction went over budget and the park wouldnt fork over the extra cash to do it right.
Sephiroth7 on 3/30/2002 8:16:11 PM said:
I thought it was displayed nice personally...although I can see people thinking its cheesy. But even though its a little cheesy, I wouldnt think it would throw off so many reviews...and they got that cool name thing hehe, although it doesnt work too well...
xDisney on 3/30/2002 8:21:38 PM said:
When ET phoned home from this attraction they wouldnt accept the charges.
Sephiroth7 on 3/31/2002 2:51:24 PM said:
Luckily he found a way to send it via satalite and they came and picked him up...damn collect calls, too much money these days...
thechad on 6/26/2003 6:33:26 PM said:
E.T. rules. My childhood hero finally came life. Wan mess wit E.T.? ...............Dont mess with the E to da T..............no dont mess! By the way E.T. is being torn down thanks to poeple like you.
Lin48 on 6/26/2003 7:07:38 PM said:
Its only out of the one in California. Apparently, the Universal Studios there is very lame anyway.
Danny on 6/27/2003 9:58:34 AM said:
Obviously--they dont have IOA and they already have Jurassic Park in Universal Studios. If they ever built an IOA park in CA (Which I highly doubt they will) theyd have to come up with ideas for a whole new island.
thechad on 6/28/2003 3:41:51 AM said:
Not necessarily. In WDW they move Star Tours around. But then again that was just a building...this is a river adventure..thing. Completely ignore that comment...
thechad on 6/28/2003 3:44:51 AM said:
Dear Paul,
I think Speilberg and whoever else were high when they designed this ride..resulting in singing shrooms. But hey...is that not what makes this the greatest ride ever!?!?!?
Post Review Comment
You must login or create an account to post a review comment.

 
Clicky Web Analytics